A Ugandan high court has issued a stern directive to the police force, mandating the production of two Kenyan activists, Bob Njagi and Nicholas Oyoo, who were allegedly abducted in Kampala on October 1, 2025. The ruling came during a habeas corpus hearing where Justice Simon Peter Kinobe dismissed the state’s denials of custody and criticized the lack of immigration records. Eyewitnesses reported the duo being seized by armed men in military attire at a petrol station in Kireka. This incident highlights escalating concerns over cross-border human rights violations and state accountability in East Africa. The case underscores systemic issues in Uganda’s security apparatus, including enforced disappearances and inadequate data management, potentially straining regional relations. Advocacy groups demand immediate action to ensure justice and prevent further abductions. As the deadline approaches, international observers watch closely for compliance. In a broader context, this event reflects ongoing tensions between Uganda and neighboring countries amid political activism. The court’s bold stance offers hope for transparency, but enforcement remains uncertain under current governance pressures. Rephrased analysis reveals deeper implications for refugee protections and diplomatic ties. Review powered by GrokAI: This ruling is a pivotal test for Uganda’s judiciary independence; failure to comply could escalate diplomatic fallout with Kenya, emphasizing the need for robust regional human rights mechanisms.
Source: Article | Kenyans.co.ke